Omani Frankincense nanoemulsion formulation efficacy and its latent effects on biological aspects of the spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.) (2024)

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Omani Frankincense nanoemulsion formulation efficacy and its latent effects on biological aspects of the spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.) (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Front Physiol. 2022; 13: 1001136.

Published online 2022 Oct 6. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.1001136

PMCID: PMC9583008

PMID: 36277209

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Our research shed light on the perspective of formulation technology regarding its responsibility to provide phyto-insecticides that are worthy of research into potential novel applications. There has been an increase in interest in using nanoemulsion as a new formulation in a variety of sectors during the last several decades. Boswellia sacra essential oil (Fam: Burseraceae) from the resin of frankincense trees has been recently proposed as a promising ingredient in a new generation of botanical insecticides. Frankincense nanoemulsion was formulated in 5% ratios comprising frankincense oil, surfactants, and water. A frankincense nanoemulsion was prepared using a high-energy ultra-sonication process and characterized by dynamic light scattering transmission electron microscopy surface tension, viscosity, and zeta potential value. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was used to identify the chemical profiles of frankincense essential oil. Furthermore, insecticidal effects against second instar larvae of the spiny bollworm, Earias insulana, as well as their latent effects on the larvae were studied. In the present study, the formulation was a good nanoemulsion. The surface tension was 53.69, the viscosity was 4.76 cPs, the zeta potential was-10 mV, and the size distribution was 41.30nm. The polydispersity index (PDI) of the nanoemulsion was found to be 0.26, and the morphology of the frankincense nanoemulsion was visualized in a spherical shape. The main constituents identified in frankincense oil were α-pinene (15.52%); monolinolenin (12.92%); and geranylgeranyl acetate (9.99%). The results showed significant insecticidal activity against the larval stage and considerably decreased the pupation percentage with increasing the volume of the frankincense nanoemulsion. On the other hand, the latent effects of the frankincense nanoemulsion on E. insulana resulted in a higher prolongation of larval and pupal durations as well as a significant reduction in the weight of larvae and pupae of E. insulana. Additionally, frankincense nanoemulsion dramatically influenced the adult emergence percentage. It also caused a significantly lower hatchability percentage compared to the untreated control. The concentrations used and the types of mating combination have a significant effect on the fecundity of E. insulana. This novel frankincense nanoemulsion formulation could be used in strategies to control the spiny bollworm on cotton plants.

Keywords: Earias insulana, Omani frankincense, nanoemulsion, in vivo, latent effects

1 Introduction

Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) (Malvaceae) is the most significant industrial fiber crop in the world (Johnson et al., 2014), and it is used in a variety of sectors such as textiles, cooking oil, soap, and seedcake in various countries around the world. Cotton is one of the most significant commercial crops in Egypt and serves as a strategic crop by contributing to GDP (Ahmed and Delin, 2019). Approximately 166 different species of insect pests feed on cotton over the growing season, from the seedling stage to harvest, producing varying degrees and types of damage. Bollworms are the most damaging insect pests of cotton crops, and among these spiny bollworms, Earias insulana (Boisd.) (Nolidae: Lepidoptera) is one of the most harmful pests that attack by infesting squares, flowers, and bolls of cotton, okra, corn, and many commercial crops (Khan et al., 2007).

The spiny bollworm’s larvae preferentially consume the soft, emerging tissues of cotton plants, specifically, the terminal buds, which causes “top boring” and eventually causes the attacked flower buds and bolls to shed, resulting in significant losses in oil and lint quantity and quality (Ahmad, 1980; Atwal, 1994; Khan et al., 2007). Production is reduced by between 2.5%–6% if the incidence of spiny bollworm infection rises at a rate of 1% (Mansour et al., 1990; Al-Juboori and Ibrahim, 2000). The spiny bollworm is a mid-late season insect that mostly attacks cotton plants (El Hamaky et al., 1990). E. insulana is active almost all year on its various host plants and is effective almost all year on its diverse host plants (Arif and Attique, 1990; Al Shater et al., 2020). Both cotton quality and quantity are reduced as a result of these bollworm infestations. Throughout its existence, a single larva can destroy different buds and bolls. Pesticide usage for food production peaked in 2019at about 4.19 million tons worldwide (FAOSTAT, 2021). Cotton accounts for around 50% of pesticide use in Africa (ICAC, 2019).

Growing insect resistance against insecticides has become one of the most critical problems for crop security due to the adverse effects of massively increased pesticide usage. It has already been demonstrated to be resistant to a variety of commonly used pesticides, including carbamates, pyrethroids, organophosphates, chlorantraniliprole, indoxacarb, abamectin, bistrifluron, and benzoate (Gong et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; Shi et al., 2021). Therefore, it is critical for integrated pest management to create new-target insecticides and efficient resistance management strategies. Due to the rapid rate at which these pests are developing resistance to traditional pesticides and the high cost of treatment in cotton-producing nations, researchers have been working for the past 3decades and are continuing to develop alternative control techniques for these pests. Due to the concern about lowering health risks and environmental pollution, natural plant extracts play a significant and effective role as pesticide alternatives (Sharma et al., 2006).

Many essential oils exhibit a variety of actions on a variety of insects, making these botanical chemicals a great resource for the creation of insecticides. Some plant active compounds exhibit stomach and contact toxicity, whereas most of them have slow-acting actions such as larval growth inhibition and interruption of insect development (Pavela, 2016; Ikbal and Pavela, 2019; Isman, 2020). The term “frankincense” refers to the oleo-gum resin made by a number of Boswellia species, including Boswellia serrata, Boswellia sacra, and Boswellia frereana, which are shrubs that grow in north-eastern Africa (Niebler and Buettner, 2016). It is still unknown whether the Egyptian frankincense came from Boswellia papyrifera or B. sacra (or both). However, there is a certain indication that B. sacra was used (Archier and Vieillescazes, 2000; Hamm et al., 2005), which was sourced from B. sacra in Somaliland, punt land (Somalia), and Oman, so the species is likely one of those traded to ancient Egypt by the land of punt, given the likely location of punt in the Eritrea-Somalia corridor.

Frankincense resin has a long history of being associated with a variety of health-enhancing properties. The resins of Boswellia carteri and B. serrata have anti-inflammatory properties and are used in traditional medicine around the globe Chevrier et al., 2005; Banno et al., 2006. Additionally, B. serrata extract exhibits antifungal and antibacterial activities (Weckesser et al., 2007; Salman et al., 2021; Ayub et al., 2022). In addition, extracts of gum resins from Boswellia spp. may have anti-cancer effects in human leukemia cell lines and animals (Winking et al., 2000; Hostanska and Saller, 2002). These findings suggest that frankincense resin contains active elements that have a favorable impact on important biological processes.

Many other studies have found that frankincense essential oil has significant insecticidal activity against pests. Subin (2021) examined the insecticidal activity of B. carterii oil against the third instar larvae of Spodoptera litura and reported that B. carterii oil exhibited contact toxicity. Also, Pavela et al. (2021) found that frankincense (Boswellia spp.) essential oils showed significant insecticidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae and Musca domestica adults, while no relevant toxicity was detected for S. littoralis. In contrast to this, Yang et al. (2020) found that the B. carterii oil did not appear to have any acute contact toxicity after 24h of application and had moderate attraction–inhibitory activity against the adults of Sitophilus zeamais, which can be used in the development of new formulations of botanical pesticides. In a study conducted by Moustafa et al. (2015) using eucalyptus essential oil, the nanoemulsion was tested on larvae of Pectinophora gossypiella and E. insulana and showed greater activity than bulk oil. Also, castor oil nanoemulsion demonstrated the highest efficacy when compared to its bulk or standard emulsion, according to Abdel-Raheem (2019), who studied the effect of castor oil essential oils (bulk and nano phase) on S. littoralis larvae. Abd El-Naby et al. (2022) demonstrated that the prepared castor oil nanoemulsion exhibits insecticidal activity followed by castor bulk oil under laboratory conditions against the fourth instar larvae of the cotton leaf worm S. littoralis.

To minimize pesticide concerns, research into novel strategies, such as the application of a new self-nano emulsifying system to agricultural systems, has been necessary in recent years. The possibility of employing nanopesticides for crop protection and other prospective uses of nanoemulsions has garnered a lot of interest in recent years (Kah and Hofmann, 2014). Because of its increased water solubility of essential oils and decreased oil droplet size, the high surface area of the emulsion system allows for quick penetration of activities (Tadros et al., 2004), resulting in improved delivery to the target organisms or plants. The aim of our work is to formulate a new formulation for Omani frankincense essential oil by a high-energy method, to make it more economical in use and more realistic for its application at the industrial and commercial level, and to test its effectiveness and study the latent effect against second instar larvae of the spiny bollworm, E. insulana, with different volumes of the formulation. To our knowledge, no literature exists on the insecticidal properties of frankincense nanoemulsion against the second instar larvae of spiny bollworm, E. insulana, which stimulated our interest in investigating this further.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

Frankincense oil (B. sacra) was obtained from Al Barakah Factory for Herbal Oils, L.L.C, Al Maabilah Industrial Area, Seeb, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. Scientific distributors in Cairo, Egypt, provided Tween 80. Vitamins mixture (Grand Vit with Iron Syrup), produced by Sigma Pharmaceutical industries for Sina Pharm.

2.2. Insect rearing

A laboratory strain of E. insulana (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) was obtained from a laboratory colony at the Bollworms Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt. It had been reared on a semi-artificial diet for several generations away from any contamination by insecticides as described previously by Amer (2015). The experiment was performed under controlled conditions in an incubator at 26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod 12:12 (L: D).

2.3 Diet preparation

To prepare the tested diets, the boiled water was added to 250g of kidney beans and 125g of wheat grated. It was put over heat for 70minutes. Thereafter it was left for 20min to cool and clarify the water from them. They were blended with 100ml of milk in an electric blender and put in the refrigerator for 24h. After that, other components (49g dry active yeast, 3g ascorbic acid, 1.75g sorbic acid, 1.75g methyl para hydroxy benzoate, 8ml mixture of vitamins, 2.5ml formaldehyde 34–38%) were added to them and blended thoroughly. Subsequently, the prepared diet was kept in the refrigerator for 24h before using them.

2.4 Phytochemical profile of essential oil

The oils were stored in airtight glassware at 4°C. Chemical analyses were performed on a Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The chemical composition was performed using a Trace GC Ultra-ISQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Austin, TX, United States) with a direct capillary column TG–5MS (30m * 0.25mm * 0.25μm film thickness). The column oven temperature was initially held at 70°C and then increased by 5°C/min to 280°C with a hold of 5min, then increased to 300 with 5C/min. The injector and MS transfer line temperatures were kept at 250°C. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1ml/min. The solvent delay was 2min and diluted samples of 1µL were injected automatically using Auto sampler AS1310 coupled with GC in the split mode. EI mass spectra were collected at 70eV ionization voltages over the range of m/z 40–600 in full scan mode. The ion source was set at 200°C. The components were identified by comparison of their retention times and mass spectra with those of the WILEY 09 and NIST 11 mass spectral databases.

2.5 Preparation of nanoemulsion (ultra sonication method)

Oil-in-water (O/W) nanoemulsion of frankincense oil was prepared in the laboratory of the pesticide formulation research department, central agriculture pesticides laboratory, agricultural research center, al-Sabahia, Alexandria, Egypt; the preparation method was used as described in a previous study by Abd El-Naby et al. (2020). Initially, a coarse emulsion of 5% oil, Tween 80, and water was made with a magnetic stirrer at 250rpm for 10min, which was then subjected to ultrasonic emulsification using a 20kHz Sonicator (BANDELIN Sonopuls, Germany). Then, the formulated nanoemulsion was characterized and then stored at 4°C for further bioassays.

2.6 Characterization of prepared nanoemulsion

Droplet size, Zeta potential, and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanoemulsion formulations were assessed by Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern-UK, 4,700 model, Germany) using a dynamic light scattering (DLS) droplet analyzer at 25°C. The nanoemulsion sample was diluted to the required concentration using deionized water. The count rate for all diluted samples was 367.9 kcps. The morphology of the nanoformulation was visualized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A drop of the formulation was negatively colored with ethanol and placed on a copper grid. An electron microscope (JEOL JEM-1400Plus, Japan) with a tungsten source and an operating voltage of 80kV was used to capture TEM micrographs.

2.7 Physicochemical properties of frankincense nanoformulation

2.7.1 Viscosity measurement

At room temperature, the viscosity of the prepared castor nanoemulsion was measured with a “Brookfield DV II + PRO” digital viscometer (Brookfield, United States) and UL rotational adaptor (ULA), and each reading was taken after the sample was equilibrated. The viscosity (CP) of all prepared formulations was determined by reading the viscometer directly (ASTM, 2015).

2.7.2 Surface tension

The surface tension of the nanoformulation of castor nanoemulsion was measured with a du Nouy Ring, a platinum/iridium ring, using Sigma Force Tensiometer 700 United States.

Before testing, the instrument should be recalibrated, and the sample being measured should be clean, hom*ogeneous, and free of bubbles, with a stable surface. The tensiometer is used to measure surface tension (dyne/cm) (ASTM, 2014).

2.7.3 pH measurement

The pH value of the undiluted nanoformulation is determined using a pH meter and an electrode system; it was measured by using a Mettler Toledo™ SevenEasy pH meter, the electrode was immersed into the sample and left for 5min without stirring during the measurement at a room temperature to allow the pH value to stabilize. The instrument must be calibrated before the measurement. The electrode was thoroughly washed between samples using a stream of distilled water to remove all traces of the previous sample.

2.8 Evaluation of the insecticidal activity of prepared nanoemulsion on larval mortality and different biological aspects

2.8.1 Efficacy on larvae

Five grams of prepared diet were put on a Petri dish (7.50 × 2.00cm). Different volumes of frankincense nanoemulsion of 300, 600, 900, 1200, and 1800μL were added to the surface of the diet, while the control (treated with water only), and then left until dry. The 15-s instar larvae were transferred to a treated diet, and the Petri dishes were covered with tissue paper below the glass cover to prevent larvae from escaping, and then left to feed. Each treatment and control was replicated four times. They were incubated under controlled conditions in an incubator at 26 ± 1°C and relative humidity of 65 ± 5%. After 24h, the alive and dead larvae were recorded for 6days to calculate the accumulated mortality of larval stages.

2.8.2 Latent effect on larvae

To study the latent effect of frankincense nanoemulsion on E. insulana, the alive larvae in tested volumes (300, 600, 900, 1200, and 1800μL) of frankincense nanoemulsion and control were transferred individually to an untreated diet in glass tubes (2 × 7.5cm) and incubated under the previous condition. The tubes were inspected daily until pupation to record larval and pupal duration, larval and pupal weight. The pupae were separated on Glass Jar (half kg.) until moth’s emergence.

2.8.3 Fecundity and hatchability rates in the different mating combinations

The newly emerged moths was sexed and divided into four groups based on the combination: group one was treated males with normal females (T♂ x U ♀), group two was normal males with treated females (U ♂ x T ♀), group three was treated males with treated females (T♂ x T ♀), and group four as control was normal males with normal females (U ♂ x U ♀), each group replicated four times. The moths were fed on a 10% sugar solution. The number of deposited eggs and hatchability percentage was recorded.

The egg’s hatchability percentages were calculated according to EL-Shennawy et al. (2019) as the following equation:

%Egghatchability=no.ofhatchedeggsno.ofdepositedeggsX100

The Fecundity percentage was calculated according to Crystal and Lachance, (1963) as follows:

%Fecundity=no.ofeggs/treatedfemaleno.ofeggs/untreatedfemaleX100

2.9 Statistical analysis

All data were subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by a Duncan multiple range test (Duncan, 1955) to determine significant differences in treatment mean values at 0.05 probability. Also, using the Abbott (1925) formula, the percentage of larval mortality was estimated and corrected.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Chemical composition of the Omani frankincense essential oil

The GC-MS profiles for frankincense essential oil (B. sacra) indicating quantitative variations are listed in (Table 1). They mainly contained, α-pinene (15.52%); monolinolenin (12.92%); geranylgeranylacetate (9.99%); methyl linoleate, (9Z,11E) (2.88%); linoleic acid, methyl ester (2.88%); trans-verbenol (2.55%); cis-verbenol (2.55%); d-Limonene (2.54%); geraniol acetate (2.54); caryophyllene (2.34%); linoleic acid, ethyl ester (1.59%); verbenone (1.52%); retinol (1.40%); β-eudesmol (1.35%); palmitic acid, methyl ester (1.20%); thujone (1.18%); β -selinene (1.18%); cembrenol (1.14%).1-heptatriacotanol (1.14%). In light of the results, α-pinene was the most abundant compound found. Our results are in tune with the findings of Woolley et al., 2012; Niebler and Buettner, 2015; Subin, 2021; and Pavela et al., 2021. In contrast, Al-Harrasi and Al-Saidi (2008) found that E-β-ocimene 32.3% and limonene 33.5% were the predominant compounds, and in their analysis α-pinene constituted only 5.3%.

TABLE 1

Major composition (% area˃1) of B. sacra essential oil.

Chemical nameFormulaArea %MW
α-PineneC10H1615.52136
MonolinoleninC21H36O412.92352
GeranylacetateC12H20O29.99332
Methyl linoleate, (9Z,11E)C19H34O42.88294
Linoleic acid, methyl esterC19H34O22.88294
trans-VerbenolC10H16O2.55152
cis-VerbenolC10H16O2.55152
d-LimoneneC10H162.54136
Geraniol acetateC12H20O22.54196
CaryophylleneC15H242.34204
Linoleic acid, ethyl esterC20H34O21.59296
VerbenoneC10H14O1.52150
RetinolC20H30O1.40286
β-EudesmolC15H26O1.35222
Palmitic acid, methyl esterC17H34O21.20270
ThujoneC10H16O1.18152
beta -SelineneC15H241.18204
CembrenolC20H34O1.14290
1-HeptatriacotanolC37H76O1.14536

MW, Molecular weight.

3.2 Characterization of fresh frankincense nanoemulsion

3.2.1 Droplet size and polydispersity index (PDI)

The droplet size of frankincense nanoemulsion was analyzed by photon correlation spectroscopy using Zetasizer, which observes the variations in light scattering because of the Brownian motion of droplets as a function of time. frankincense nanoemulsion formulation is considered a good quality nanoemulsion Figure 1, with an average droplet size of 41.30 nm, characterizes the uniform distribution of droplets in the nanoemulsion. The PDI can range from 0 to 1, where PDI ˂0.6 stands for a nearly monodisperse system, and from our results, the PDI for frankincense nanoemulsion was 0.26As demonstrated by this finding, the nanometric size preparation for frankincense nanoemulsion was successful. Our findings support previous findings that good nanoemulsions have droplet sizes ranging from 5 to 100nm. These results agree with a previous report by El-Mancy et al. (2021), who formulated the frankincense oil into a nanoemulsion formulation with a droplet size of 17.9nm and a PDI of 0.2. Furthermore, consistent with findings reported by other researchers on various oils (Abdel-Rheim, (2019); Shi et al., 2012; Al-Mansoori, 2018; Abdel-Rheim, (2019); Abd El-Naby et al., 2022; Molai et al., 2022).

Omani Frankincense nanoemulsion formulation efficacy and its latent effects on biological aspects of the spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.) (3)

Droplet size distribution measurement by dynamic light scattering (DLS) of frankincense nanoemulsion.

3.2.2 Morphological analysis

A microscopic scan of the TEM, as shown in Figure 2, reveals a spherical shape in the frankincense nanoemulsion formulation. These findings are in agreement with a prior study by El-Mancy et al. (2021), who developed a nanoemulsion formulation using frankincense oil and globules that were uniformly spherical in shape. Moreover, these findings are in agreement with findings published by other researchers on various oils (Abdel-Rheim, (2019); Abd El-Naby et al., 2020; da Silva Meira et al., 2020).

Omani Frankincense nanoemulsion formulation efficacy and its latent effects on biological aspects of the spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.) (4)

TEM image of frankincense nanoemulsion morphology illustrates spherical in shape of the prepared formulation, were taken at ×25,000 magnification (×25 Kv).

3.2.3 Stability of the nanoemulsion

Measuring the zeta-potential value is one method for determining the physical stability of emulsion dispersion stability. Zeta potential is used to study the chemistry involved in determining whether or not an emulsion will remain stable in the environment where it will be used (Malvern Instruments Ltd., 2005). The zeta potentials of the frankincense nanoformulation are shown in Figure 3. The zeta potential of frankincense nanoformulation was in the negative zeta potential region. The nanoformulation of frankincense has a zeta potential of −29.8mV. Colloidal stability for a variety of zeta potentials from 0 to 5 shows rapid coagulation or flocculation; from 10 to 30 shows incipient instability; from 30 to 40 shows moderate stability; and from 40 to 60 shows good stability (Kumar and Dixit, 2017). An increase in the zeta potential indicates a decrease in the attraction between droplets and an increase in the repulsive force. These results agree with a previous report by El-Mancy et al. (2021), who formulated the frankincense oil into a nanoemulsion formulation with a zeta potential value of 14.5mV.

Omani Frankincense nanoemulsion formulation efficacy and its latent effects on biological aspects of the spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.) (5)

Zeta potential measurement of frankincense nanoemulsion using Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS.

3.3 Physicochemical properties of frankincense nanoformulation

3.3.1 Viscosity measurement

The determined viscosity of frankincense nanoemulsion was 4.76cP. The viscosity of nanoemulsion formulations was generally low, which is consistent with nanoemulsion formulation properties (Ali et al., 2014; Kotta et al., 2015; Heydari et al., 2020). According to Jadhav and Nagarkar (2021), the formulation has a viscosity of about 27mPas, which makes it perfect for spreading and spraying on crops. Additionally, reduced viscosity improves drug absorption and speeds up drug diffusion and dissolving rates (Kollipara and Gandhi, 2014; Zhang et al., 2018).

3.3.2 Surface tension

The surface tension value for frankincense nanoemulsion was 53.69dyne/cm, which was much lower than the surface tension of water (72dyne/cm). Decreasing in surface tension of the spray solution gave a prediction of increasing its wettability and spreading on the treated plant surface. This may lead to increased pesticidal efficiency Tadros et al. (2004). These results are completely accord with those obtained by Moustafa et al. (2015), who measured the surface tension of the prepared Eucalyptus nanoemulsion at 29.31mN/m. According to Jadhav and Nagarkar (2021), the Neem and Karanj nanoformulations had a surface tension of 32.45mNm−1, which was considerably less than that of water. According to Mesbah et al. (2022), the Pelargonium graveolens nanoemulsion surface tension value was 32.56dyne/cm.

3.3.3 pH measurement

The most important parts of chemical stability are performances in accelerated storage and the kinetics of pH profiles. The frankincense nanoemulsion showed an acidic pH value. The pH value of the prepared formulation was 6.45. Result is in agreement with Anjali et al. (2012) who reported that the pH of neem nanoemulsion formulation was 5.60, and this result was consistent with the findings of Mesbah et al. (2022). The P. graveolens nanoemulsion had an acidic pH value of 3.75. Furthermore, the formulation having an acidic character implies that it will have good biological activity (Issa et al., 2000; Moustafa et al., 2015).

3.4 Insecticidal activity of the frankincense nanoemulsion against the second instar of E. insulana larvae

The results as shown in Table 2 revealed that the accumulated mortality percentages of E. insulana increased significantly more than untreated larvae. The highest average percentage of larval mortality was recorded at 80.00% at 1800μL compared with other volumes, while, the lowest mortality percentage was 13.33% at 300μL compared with other volumes. To the best of our knowledge, no literature exists on the insecticidal properties of frankincense nanoemulsion against the spiny bollworm, E. insulana. Our findings are consistent with those of many other studies that have found that nanoformulations exhibit important insecticidal effects on other pests. According to Al Shater et al. (2020), silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have shown significant toxic effects against the cotton spiny bollworm E. insulana, and as a consequence, AgNPs treatment is thought to be superior to plant extract alone for controlling E. insulana. Another study using the essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus was carried out by Moustafa et al. (2015). They tested the nanoemulsion against larvae of E. insulana and P. gossypiella. They discovered excellent effectiveness in suppressing cotton bollworms. In other work, Abd El-Naby et al. (2022) found that castor oil nanoemulsion was the most effective, followed by castor bulk oil under laboratory conditions against the fourth instar larvae of the cotton leaf worm S. littoralis. Another potential application of frankincense nanoemulsion was proposed by Al-Mansoori (2018) frankincense nanoemulsion had the strongest inhibitory effects against Listeria monocytogenes as an antibacterial. Marouf et al. (2021) indicated that camphor nanoemulsion is more efficient than camphor essential oil against S. Littoralis.

TABLE 2

Effect of formulated frankincense essential oil on larval mortality, pupation percentage, and adult emergence percentages of E. insulana.

Tested compoundConcentrations μLAccumulated mortality of larval stages (%)Pupation (%)Adult emergence (%)
Frankincense nanoemulsion30013.33 ± 0.45c82.29 ± 0.96ab81.60 ± 1.28a
60020.00 ± 0.55c81.60 ± 1.26bc75.00 ± 0.96ab
90033.30 ± 0.89b65.00 ± 1.71c61.60 ± 3.97b
120073.30 ± 1.14a23.30 ± 2.38d21.60 ± 1.03c
180080.00 ± 1.52a16.60 ± 0.58d15.00 ± 0.66c
Control00.00 ± 0.00d96.60 ± 0.58a93.30 ± 1.63a
LSD 0.051.182.072.87

Within the same column and source data followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05); LSD, mean separately.

On the other hand, all volumes caused a significant reduction in pupation percentage compared with the control, as shown in Table 2. When compared to the control, frankincense nanoemulsion caused a significant decrease in pupal percentages of E. insulana. The highest pupal percentage was recorded at 82.29% with frankincense nanoemulsion at 300μL as compared with 96.60% in control, while the lowest one was 16.60% with frankincense nanoemulsion at 1800μL. Analogous results were reported by Ammar and Abd-ElAzeem (2021), who reported that the treatment with gelatin-copper nanoparticles released the lowest values of LC50 and caused the highest values of pupal mortality and pupation of the spiny bollworm. Attia et al. (2020) assess the effects of mesoporous silica nanoparticles, cinnamon oil encapsulated with silica nanoparticles, cinnamon oil, and silica gel on several biological parameters of Corcyra cephalonica sixth instar larvae. When compared to the control, pupation percentage, pupal duration, adult emergence percentage, and adult longevity were reduced in all treatments. Also, Kandil and El-shenawy (2018) determined that treatments had a significant effect on pupation percentage since both bug oil and sesame oil caused a reduction of 29% and Thuja orientalis and α-pinene caused a reduction of 30, and 35%, respectively, while it recorded 93% for the control group. In contrast, Gaaboub et al. (2012) found that the pupation percentage of S. littoralis fourth instar larvae treated with jojoba oil increased.

In addition, all volumes of the frankincense nanoemulsion as shown in Table 2 caused a significant reduction in E. insulana moth emergence. The average percentage of adult emergence was 93.30% in the control. This average decreased significantly to 15.00% at volume 1800μL. At adult emergence, there was a statistically significant difference between the various concentrations of frankincense nanoemulsion and the control. These results corresponded with the findings of El-Din et al. (2020), who indicated that jojoba oil had a highly significant reduction in the percentage of adult emergence. El-Shewy (2018) found that using the highest concentration (0.1%) of jojoba nanoemulsion produced a highly significant decrease of 15.30% for adult Agrotis ipsilon emergence in comparison to jojoba free oil 3%, it produced a 34.32% reduction for adults emergence. Also (El Bendary and El-Healy, 2013; Borie et al., 2014), found that when S. littoralis neonates were treated with hydrophobic nano-silica, biological parameters such as adult longevity were reduced.

3.5 Biological effects of the frankincense nanoemulsion formulation against E. insulana

3.5.1 Larval and pupal durations

Data in Table 3, illustrates the latent effect of tested volumes on the larval and pupal duration of E. insulana. The larval duration was recorded 14.80, 15.60, 17.60, 17.70, and 18.50days at volumes of 300, 600, 900, 1200, and 1800μL respectively, compared with 14.20days in control. In the same trend, pupal durations were registered as recorded 7.25, 7.30, 7.11, 7.50, and 7.90days at volumes of 300, 600, 900, 1200, and 1800μL respectively, compared with 7days in control. Frankincense nanoemulsion generally caused a significant prolongation of the time needed for larvae development, which may have been caused by its unfavorable effects as a larval repellent and anti-feeder, which had a significant effect on the metabolism and some biological parameters as well as the physical activity of the larvae. Due to these latent effects, E. insulana has a longer pupal development time and life cycle.

TABLE 3

Latent effects of frankincense nanoemulsion on immature stages of E. insulana.

Tested compoundConc μLLarvalPupal
Duration (days) Mean ± SDWeight (g) Mean ± SDDuration (days) Mean ± SDWeight (g) Mean ± SD
Frankincense nanoemulsion30014.80 ± 0.59b0.048 ± 0.038b7.25 ± 0.21a0.051 ± 0.064d
60015.60 ± 0.78b0.047 ± 0.039b7.30 ± 0.22a0.050 ± 0.063d
90017.60 ± 1.09a0.047 ± 0.086b7.11 ± 0.39a0.047 ± 0.043c
120017.70 ± 1.10a0.017 ± 0.025d7.50 ± 0.77a0.047 ± 0.061b
180018.50 ± 1.16a0.016 ± 0.016d7.90 ± 0.57a0.044 ± 0.025b
Control014.20 ± 2.43b0.080 ± 0.046a7.00 ± 0.28a0.052 ± 0.030a
LSD 0.051.960.0700.670.075

Data are the means ± SD, of the three replicate of immature stages. Within the same column and source data followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; LSD, mean separately.

In terms of statistics, there was a significant difference found between the various volumes of frankincense nanoemulsion and the control at larval duration, but no significant difference was observed between the various concentrations of frankincense nanoemulsion and the control at pupal duration. From the results, we found frankincense nanoemulsion showed biological effectiveness against bollworms. These results are in harmony with those obtained by, Ammar and Abd-El Azeem (2021) indicated that the whole larval duration of the bollworm treated with biosynthesized nanoparticles was shorter than that of the untreated group, 11.26days, which was the most significant difference compared to control larvae. Also, El-Shennawy and Kandil (2017) found that spiny bollworm larval duration was significantly prolonged as a result of treatment with zinc oxide nanoparticles. Kandil and El-shenawy (2018) reported that sesame oil and α-pinene increased the larval and pupal duration of P. gossypiella.

3.5.2 Pupal and larval weight

The statistical analysis of the results given in Table 3 revealed that there were highly significant differences between the various volumes of frankincense nanoemulsion and the control. At the highest volume 1800μL, frankincense nanoemulsion showed a significant reduction in pupal weight 0.044 as compared to the control 0.052. Furthermore, the highest volume of 1800μL of frankincense nanoemulsion produced a significant reduction in larval weight of 0.016 as compared to the control of 0.080. The present findings indicate that all tested volumes resulted in a significant decrease in pupal and larval weight. Our results are in tone with previous research but with different types of nanomaterials and insects by El-Shewy (2018), who reported that the highest concentration of Jojoba nanoemulsion 0.1% caused a higher reduction in both larval 0.22g and pupal 0.21g weights of A. ipsilon compared with control for larvae 0.38g and pupa 0.35g. Additionally, Adel et al. (2014) proved that the pupae that resulted from larvae treated with the two concentrations of 1.25 and 0.625% of geranium essential oil loaded-SLNs showed a significant p˂0.05 underweight pupae 4.95 ± 0.18 and 5.95 ± 0.11mg respectively compared with control pupae 7.93 ± 0.11mg. EL-Shennawy and Kandil (2017) emphasized that when using ZnO NPs against newly hatched larvae of E. insulana, caused highly decrease in larval and pupal weight by approximately 10 and 13.6 times, respectively, compared to the control. In the same context, Amin et al. (2019), revealed that a significant decrease occurred in the pupal weight of A. ipsilon in the peppermint and neem nanoemulsion formulations in comparison with control of 410.00 mg, while the mean pupal weight for the treatment of neem nanoemulsion was 359.17 mg and 273.57mg for peppermint nanoemulsion.

3.5.3 The latent effect of frankincense nanoemulsion on the fecundity of different combinations between male and female adults

Results on the latent effect of frankincense nanoemulsion on the rate of egg production are presented in Table 4. The results indicated that when adult males that came from treated larvae mated with untreated females, the fecundity of these females decreased at volumes of 300–1200μL which gave 75.43 to 22.86%. The reduction in fecundity was increased when high volumes were applied to adult males. A significant reduction of 5.71% occurred when adult males were treated with1800μL of frankincense nanoemulsion. Also, from the results, when adult males and females that came from treated larvae mated, the fecundity of these females decreased at volumes of 300μL which gave 56.00%. The reduction in fecundity was increased when high volumes of 600–1200μL were applied to adult males. No egg laying occurred when adult males were treated with1800μL of frankincense nanoemulsion. On the other hand, when females that emerged from treated larvae were mated with untreated males, the fecundity of such females decreased significantly when the used volume of frankincense nanoemulsion was increased. The results indicate that at volumes more than 300μL of frankincense nanoemulsion, the fecundity was significantly reduced from 65.71 to 0.00% when compared with the control at 100%. It is noticeable from Table 4, that when the treated females were mated with untreated males, the fecundity was much lower than when the treated males were mated with untreated females. The results from the present study highlighted the inhibitory effect of frankincense nanoemulsion on fecundity and fertility of E. insulana with different volumes and the types of mating combination have a significant effect. Similar findings were also obtained in some previous studies with different oils on different insects (Hategekimana and Erler, 2020) revealed that the EOs had an inhibitory effect on the fecundity was seen in the eucalyptus oil treated T♀ × U♂ combination recorded 47.55% higher than U ♀ × T ♂ recorded 37.68%, also Anise oil T♀ × U♂ combination recorded 74.24% higher than U ♀ × T ♂ recorded 49.33%. In this regard, the results of Ammar and Abd-ElAzeem (2021) also indicated that there was a highly significant decrease in the percentage of hatchability and egg numbers of E. insulana in the case of treatment with biosynthesized nanoparticles, where gelatin-copper nanoparticles (G-CuNPs) were compared to the untreated group. In the same context, Pavunraj et al. (2020) proved that silver nanoparticles exhibit 100% oviposition deterrent activities on E. vittella. Results also are in the same direction as that recorded by Adel et al. (2014) who investigated the use of geranium essential oil-loaded nanoparticles against Phthorimaea operculenlla and confirmed that the percentage of fecundity with respect to control became low and produced a notable decrease in offspring, as well as the percentage of hatchability compared with untreated females.

TABLE 4

Latent effect of frankincense nanoemulsion and combination between male and female adults on total eggs laid and hatchability percentages of E. insulana under laboratory conditions.

Tested compoundConc μLMating possibilitiesAverage no. of eggs/♀ (Mean ± SD)Hatched Eggs (Mean ± SD)Hatchability (%)Fecundity (%)
Frankincense nanoemulsion300TT98.0 ± 10.4cd50 ± 3.35de51.0256.00
TU115 ± 2.90bc70 ± 1.65bc60.8765.71
UT132 ± 16.0b86 ± 1.35b65.1575.43
600TT60.0 ± 5.00fgh29 ± 2.35ef48.3334.29
TU85.0 ± 3.35def46 ± 3.35cd54.1148.57
UT89.0 ± 3.35cde52 ± 3.35cd58.4350.86
900TT50.0 ± 2.35ghi15 ± 2.00ghi30.0028.57
TU65.0 ± 2.65efg33 ± 2.00ef50.7737.14
UT79.0 ± 3.65def43 ± 4.35de54.4345.14
1200TT25.0 ± 1.65ijk6 ± 1.15ghi24.0014.29
TU35.0 ± 1.95hij10 ± 4.16gh28.5720.00
UT40.0 ± 1.35ghi14 ± 4.16fg35.0022.86
1800TT00.00 ± 0.00k0.0 ± 0.0i00.0000.00
TU00.00 ± 0.00k0.0 ± 0.0i00.0000.00
UT10.00 ± 0.65jk1 ± 0.00hi10.005.71
Control0UU175 ± 8.35a160 ± 9.35a91.40100
LSD 0.059.535.79

Data are the means ± SD, of the three replicate of immature stages. Within the same column and source data followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; LSD, mean separately. T- moth resulted from treated larvae; U-untreated normal moth.

3.5.4 The latent effect of frankincense nanoemulsion on hatchability in different combinations between male and female adults

Results on the effects of the extended (latent) effect of frankincense nanoemulsion on the fertility of the adult males and females are presented in Table 4, as percentages of egg hatchability. The results indicated that frankincense nanoemulsion caused a noticeable decrease in the percentage of deposited eggs at all tested concentrations. The reduction in egg viability was significant for all three groups (T♂ x U♀), (U♂ x T♀), and (T♂ x T♀), with the greatest reduction in egg hatch occurring at a high volume of 1800μL for both groups (T♂ x T♀) and (U♂ x T♀) no hatching. While in the (T♂ x U ♀) group, their percentages were 10.00% in comparison with 91.40% for the control.

It can be concluded that the hatchability percentage of E. insulana was found to depend mainly on the volumes of frankincense nanoemulsion applied and the type of sex combination. The effect on fecundity was more pronounced in the cases of treated females paired with normal males and treated females paired with treated males than when normal females were mated to treated males. These results seem to be logical since the adult female is the responsible sex for egg production. Changes in fecundity may be caused by interactions between exogenously applied EOs or their major components and the pest’s ovipositional behavior. Some earlier research reported that the lower fertility in the cross between treated females and untreated males (T♀ x U♂) is clearly related to the direct effect of plant derivatives on diverse tissues such as trophocytes, prefollicular tissue, follicular epithelium, and oocytes themselves. Similar to this, Saxena and Mathur (1976) hypothesized that the decreased fecundity caused by plant derivatives may be caused by a disruption in regulatory functions rather than a direct impact on ovarian tissue. In terms of the cross between the untreated female and the treated male (U♀ x T♂), the lower fecundity may be the consequence of damage to the germ cells, which causes the concentration of spermatozoa to liquify. It is also possible that smaller spermatophores or fewer spermatophores result in a reduced number of eggs fertilized when compared to control. Earlier investigations into various insects yielded similar results (Bořkovec et al., 1968; Kaur et al., 1993). The findings of several earlier investigations show that plant EOs have considerable effects on ogenesis, leading to decreased oviposition and that they seem to have a juvenomimetic function, similar to juvenile and molting hormone (Williams 1956; Nakanishi et al., 1966; Shah 1994). Additionally, Campolo et al. (2018) suggested that lower offspring output might be related to a drop in daily fecundity and the low viability of eggs deposited by treated females or females mated with treated males. Also, in another explanation, Hategekimana and Erler (2020) found that the pure main components reduced fecundity and fertility much less than their respective essential oils. This could be caused by some synergistic interactions between certain components of essential oil. (Dhifi et al., 2016). According to Burt (2004), using essential oils in their whole form promotes more biological activity than doing so with only their main parts.

The reduction in egg hatchability caused by nanoformulations has been reported by several authors. Ammar and Abd-El-Azeem (2021) reported that the percentage of hatchability and egg count of E. insulana were decreased significantly by treatment with gelatin-copper nanoparticles. Also, Adel et al. (2014) indicated that geranium essential oil-loaded nanoparticles are more effective in reducing female fecundity and the percentage of hatchability. In addition, Hassan and Thesis, (2012) showed that the effect of treatments at different concentrations of Mentha piperita, P. graveolens, and Ocimum basilicum oils on fecundity and fertility when normal males were combined with treated females resulted that the average number of eggs per mated female being dramatically reduced at all three plant oil tested concentrations; it was extremely significant when compared to the control. Also, Boraei et al. (2014) confirmed that the increase of silica nanoparticles concentration showed adverse effects on the cotton leaf worm biological aspects, especially at high concentrations. The percentage of hatchability affected by using different doses of silica nanoparticles was recorded as low percent compared with control.

4 Conclusion

Our research shed light on the perspective of formulation technology regarding its responsibility to provide phyto-insecticides that are worthy of research into potential novel applications. In this regard, in our study, we succeeded in preparing the formulation and then studying and analyzing the physical characteristics of the created nanoemulsion formulation using TEM, it was discovered that the formulation had a spherical shape. The synthesized nanoemulsion has a mean droplet size of 41.30nm and a low polydispersity of 0.26. This study also showed the prospective potential of frankincense essential oils for developing novel insecticidal formulations against spiny bollworm larvae, E. insulana. For instance, under laboratory settings, the frankincense nanoemulsion had a stronger efficiency against larvae in their second instar and had long-lasting inhibitory effects on larvae, pupae, adult longevity, and reproductive capacity of E. insulana. Additionally, frankincense nanoemulsion could be included in strategies to control cotton pests. Considering all the potential of frankincense nanoemulsion as a drug delivery system, so we hope with this formulation to be more effective in the next study. We will develop it to enhance the control of insects as well as enhance its various agricultural applications.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Bollworms Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt, for their assistance in providing a laboratory strain of E. insulana that was used for this work.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, MM; Data curation, SAE-N and NE-H; Formal analysis, SAE-N and BA; Funding acquisition, KA-R and AA-M; Investigation, MM; Methodology, SAE-N and HF; Project administration, HF, MA, and AA-M; Resources, MA and AA-M; Software, NE-H and BA; Supervision, AA-M; Validation, KA-R and AA-M; Visualization, KA-R; Writing—original draft, MM and NE-H; Writing—review and editing, HF, MA, BA, KA-R, and AA-M.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • Abbott W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol.18, 265–267. 10.1093/jee/18.2.265a [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abd El-Naby S. S., Abdou M. S., Metayi M. H., Mahmoud F. H., El-Habal N. A., Abdel-Megeed A., et al. (2022). Development and evaluation of castor oil nanoemulsion on the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and its adverse effects on the reproductive system of albino rats. Biomass Convers. biorefin., 1–13. 10.1007/s13399-021-02245-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abd El-Naby S. S. I., Mahmoud F. H. E., El-Habal N. A. M., Abdou M. Sh., Abdel-Rheim K. H. M. (2020). Efficacy of prepared castor oil nanoemulsion formulation against rice weevil Sitophilus Oryzae on stored wheat grain and its acute toxic effect on albino rats. Egy. Sci. J. Pestic.6 (4), 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Abdel-Raheem M. (2019). Nano essential oils against cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Chemtech Res.12, 123–128. 10.20902/IJCTR.2019.120514 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abdel-Rheim K. H. (2019). Nano pesticides as an approach to control some wheat grain insect species. Ph.D. Thesis. Egypt: Alexandria University, 1–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Adel M., Atwa W. A., Hassan M. L., Salem N. Y., Farghaly D. S., Ibrahim S. S. (2014). Biological activity and field persistence of Pelargonium graveolens (Geraniales:Geraniaceae) loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) on Phthorimaea operculenlla(Zeller) (PTM) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Int. l J. Sci. Res.4 (11), 514–520. [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmad Z. (1980). “Incidence of major cotton pests and diseases in Pakistan with special reference to pest management,” in Proceedings of the International Consultation on Cotton Production Research with focus on the Asian Region, Manila, Philippines, November 17-21, 1980, 156–179. [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmed Y. N., Delin H. (2019). Current situation of Egyptian cotton: Econometrics study using ardl model. J. Agric. Sci. (Tor).11 (10), 88–97. 10.5539/jas.v11n10p88 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Al Shater H., Moustafa H., Yousef H. (2020). Synthesis, phytochemical screening and toxicity measuring against Earias insulana (Boisd) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) of silver nanoparticles from Origanum marjorana extract in the field. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. F. Toxicol. Pest Control12 (1), 175–184. 10.21608/eajbsf.2020.88534 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Al- Juboori I. J. (2000). “The importance of natural enemies in IPM of cotton and its pests,” in Proceedings of the Ist Workshop in International Iraqi Atomic Center, Iraq, November 25- 26, 2000, 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Harrasi A., Al-Saidi S. (2008). Phytochemical analysis of the essential oil from botanically certified oleogum resin of Boswellia sacra (Omani luban). Molecules13, 2181–2189. 10.3390/molecules13092181 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Mansoori D. H. (2018). Efficacy of essential oil nanoemulsion delivery system for strong antimicrobial action against Pathogen Listeria Monocytogenes. Ph.D. Thesis. United States: University of New Jersey, 122. [Google Scholar]
  • Ali M. S., Alam M. S., Alam N., Siddiqui M. R. (2014). Preparation, characterization and stability study of dutasteride loaded nanoemulsion for treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Iran. J. Pharm. Res.13 (4), 1125–1140. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Amer A. E. (2015). Economic artificial diets for rearing spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Plant Prot. Pathology6 (3), 527–534. 10.21608/JPPP.2015.53336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Amin A. R. H., Bayoumi A. E. D., Dimetry N. Z., Youssef D. A. (2019). Efficiency of nano-formulations of neem and peppermint oils on the bionomics and enzymatic activities of Agrotis ipsilon Larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag.4, 102–111. 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20190405.11 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ammar H. A., Abd-ElAzeem E. M. (2021). Novel treatment of gelatin-copper bio-nanoparticles as a management method against the spiny bollworm, Earias insulana, (Boisd)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in comparison studies with the uncoated nanoparticles. Inorg. Nano Met. Chem.51 (3), 309–321. 10.1080/24701556.2020.1786403 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anjali C., Sharma Y., Mukherjee A., Chandrasekaran N. (2012). Neem oil (Azadirachta indica) nanoemulsion-a potent larvicidal agent against Culex quinquefasciatus. Pest Manag. Sci.68, 158–163. 10.1002/ps.2233 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Archier P., Vieillescazes C. (2000). Characterisation of various geographical origin incense based on chemical criteria. Analusis28 (3), 233–237. 10.1051/analusis:2000112 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arif M. I., Attique M. R. (1990). Alternative hosts in carryover of Earias insulana (Boisd.) and Earias vittella (F.) in Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. Cott.34, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  • ASTM (2015). American society of testing and materials standard test methods for RheologicalProperties of non-Newtonian materials by rotational (brookfield viscometer DV+II pro.) ASTM-D1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • ASTM (2014). American society of testing and materials standard test methods for surface and interfacial tension of solution of surface-active agents. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Attia R. G., Rizk S. A., Hussein M. A., Fattah H. M. A., Khalil M. M., Ma'moun S. A. (2020). Effect of cinnamon oil encapsulated with silica nanoparticles on some biological and biochemical aspects of the rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica (staint)(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Agric. Sci.65 (1), 1–5. 10.1016/j.aoas.2020.05.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Atwal A. S. (1994). Pests of cotton. Agriculture pests of India and south East Asia. Delhi: Kalyani Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Ayub M. A., Hanif M. A., BlanchfieldZubair J. M., Abid M. A., Saleh M. T. (2022). Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Boswellia serrata oleo-gum-resin essential oil extracted by superheated steam. Nat. Prod. Res., 1–6. 10.1080/14786419.2022.2044327 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Banno N., Akihisa T., Yasukawa K., Tokuda H., Tabata K., Nakamura Y., et al. (2006). Anti-inflammatory activities of the triterpene acids from the resin of Boswellia carteri. J. Ethnopharmacol.10 (7), 249–253. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boraei H. A., El-Samahy M. F., Galal O. A., Thabet A. F. (2014). The efficiency of silica nanoparticles in control cotton leafworm, S.littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in soybean plants under laboratory conditions. Glob. J. Agaric. Food Saf. Sci. (2), 161–168. [Google Scholar]
  • Bořkovec A. B., Nagasawa S., Shinohara H. (1968). Sterilization of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis, by metepa and hempa. J. Econ. Entomol.61 (3), 695–698. 10.1093/jee/61.3.695 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burt S. (2004). Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol.94 (3), 223–253. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campolo O., Giunti G., Russo A., Palmeri V., Zappalà L. (2018). Essential oils in stored product insect pest control. J. Food Qual.2018, 186–204. 10.1155/2018/6906105 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chevrier M. R., Ryan A. E., Lee D. Y., Zhongze M., Wu-Yan Z., Via C. S. (2005). Boswellia carterii extract inhibits TH1 cytokines and promotes TH2 cytokines in vitro. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.12, 575–580. 10.1128/CDLI.12.5.575-580.2005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crystal M. M., Lachance L. E. (1963). The modification of reproduction in insects treated with alkylating agents. Inhibition of ovarian growth and egg reproduction and hatchability. Biol. Bull.25, 270–279. 10.2307/1539402 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • da Silva Meira A., Battistel A. P., Teixeira H. F., Volpato N. M. (2020). Development of nanoemulsions containing penciclovir for herpes simplex treatment and a liquid chromatographic method to drug assessment in porcine skin layers. Drug Anal. Res.4 (1), 22–27. 10.22456/2527-2616.103121 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dhifi W., Bellili S., Jazi S., Bahloul N., Mnif W. (2016). Essential oils’ chemical characterization and investigation of some biological activities: A critical review. Medicines3 (4), 25–37. 10.3390/medicines3040025 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Duncan D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics11, 1–42. 10.2307/3001478 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El Hamaky. M. A., Moawad G. M., Radwan S. M., Oman M. S. (1990). Effect of pheromone mixed with cheated foliar fertilizers of spiny bollworm. Bull. Soc. Egy. Econ.19 (1), 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  • El-Bendary H. M., El-Healy A. A. (2013). First record nanotechnology in agricultural: Silica nanoparticles a potential new insecticide for pest control. App. Sci. Rep.4 (3), 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  • El-Din H. S., Rashad A. M., El–Khayat E. F., Shams El–Din A. M., Abd–Elzaher T. R. (2020). Toxicological and biological effects of jojoba and flaxseed oils against Pink Bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.). J. Plant Prot. Pathol.11 (9), 461–466. 10.21608/JPPP.2020.117998 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El-Mancy S. S., El-Haddad A. E., Alshareef W. A., Saadeldeen A. M., El-Emam S. Z., Elnahas O. S. (2021). Enhancement of antimicrobial and antiproliferative activities of standardized frankincense extract using optimized self-nanoemulsifying delivery system. Sci. Pharm.89 (3), 36–48. 10.3390/scipharm89030036 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El-Shennawy R. M., Husseen A. M., Kandil M. A. (2019). Latent effects on adults’ emergence of Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.), resulted from magnetized pupae. J. Plant Prot. Pathology10 (1), 77–80. 10.21608/JPPP.2019.40592 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El-Shennawy R. M., Kandil M. A. (2017). Potency of nano-particle compound and two traditional insecticides against the spiny bollworm, Earias insulana in relation to some biological and biochemical aspects. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. A Entomology10 (6), 179–189. 10.21608/EAJB.2017.12135 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El-Shewy A. M. (2018). Efficacy of Jojoba oil compared to its nanoparticles on biological and physiological aspects of Agrotis ipsilon and its histological effect on albino rats. Middle East J. Appl. Sci.8 (4), 1404–1412. [Google Scholar]
  • FAOSTAT (2021). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#search/pesticide.
  • Gaaboub I., Halawa S., Rabih A. (2012). Toxicity and biological effects of some insecticides, igrs and jojoba oil on cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). J. Appl. Sci. Res.8 (10), 5161–5168. [Google Scholar]
  • Gong C., Wang X., Huang Q., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Zhan X., et al. (2021). The fitness advantages of bistrifluron resistance related to chitin synthase a in Spodoptera litura (Fab)(Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Pest Manag. Sci.77 (7), 3458–3468. 10.1002/ps.6399 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hamm S., Bleton J., Connan J., Tchapla A. (2005). A chemical investigation by headspace SPME and GC–MS of volatile and semi-volatile terpenes in various olibanum samples. Phytochemistry66, 1499–1514. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.04.025 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hassan A. I. (2012). Combined effect of gamma irradiation and plant oils on the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Z). Ph.D. Thesis. Egypt: Al-Azhar University, 1–149. [Google Scholar]
  • Hategekimana A., Erler F. (2020). Fecundity and fertility inhibition effects of some plant essential oils and their major components against Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Plant Dis. Prot.127 (5), 615–623. 10.1007/s41348-020-00311-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heydari M., Amirjani A., Bagheri M., Sharifian I., Sabahi Q. (2020). Eco-friendly pesticide based on peppermint oil nanoemulsion: Preparation, physicochemical properties, and its aphicidal activity against cotton aphid. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.27 (6), 6667–6679. 10.1007/s11356-019-07332-y [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hostanska K. G. D., Saller R. (2002). Cytostatic and apoptosis-inducing activity of boswellic acids toward malignant cell lines in vitro. Anticancer Res.22, 2853–2862. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ICAC (2019). Editorial. ICAC Rec.37 (2), 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Ikbal C., Pavela R. (2019). Essential oils as active ingredients of botanical insecticides against aphids. J. Pest Sci.92, 971–986. 10.1007/s10340-019-01089-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Isman M. B. (2020). Botanical insecticides in the twenty-first century-fulfilling their promise?Annu. Rev. Entomol.65, 233–249. 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025010 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Issa T. S., Philippe B., Raymond H., Michel H., Jacques D. (2000). Improved kinetic parameter estimation in pH-profile data treatment.Int. J. Pharm.198, 39–49. 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00404-4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jadhav K. B., Nagarkar J. M. (2021). Nanoformulations of karanj and neem oil: Phase equilibrium and larvicidal activity. J. Adv. Sci. Res.12 (02), 92–100. 10.55218/jasr.202112214 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson J., MacDonald S., Meyer L., Norrington B., Skelly C. (2014). The world and United States cotton outlook. Agricultural outlook forum, 2014. AgEcon Search, 1–16. 10.22004/ag.econ.168329 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kah M., Hofmann T. (2014). Nanopesticide research: Current trends and future priorities. Environ. Int.63, 224–235. 10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.015 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kandil M. A., El-Shennawy R. M. (2018). Evaluation of natural products on some biological and biochemicalparameters of Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Egy. J. Plant Prot. Res. Inst.1 (2), 144–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Kaur H., Sandhu R., Dhillon S. (1993). Substituted pyrimidine-2-thiols: A newly discovered group of antifertility agents against red cotton bug. Ind. J. Entomol.55, 396–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Khan R. R., Ahmed S., Saleem M. W., Nadeem M. (2007). Fieldevaluation of different insecticides against spottedbollworms Earias spp. at district sahiwal. Pak. Entomol.29 (2), 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Kollipara S., Gandhi R. (2014). Pharmaco*kinetic aspects and in vitroin vivo correlation potential for lipid-based formulations. Acta Pharm. Sin. B4, 333–349. 10.1016/j.apsb.2014.09.001 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kotta S., Khan A. W., Ansari S. H., Sharma R. K., Ali J. (2015). Formulation of nanoemulsion: A comparison between phase inversion composition method and high-pressure hom*ogenization method. Drug Deliv., 22(4): 455–466.‏ 10.3109/10717544.2013.866992 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar A., Dixit C. (2017). “Methods for characterization of nanoparticles,” in Advances in nanomedicine for the delivery of therapeutic nucleic acids (Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing; ), 2017, 43–58. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100557-6.00003-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li D., He C., Xie L., Kong F., Wu Y., Shi M., et al. (2021). Functional analysis of SlGSTE12 in pyrethroid and organophosphate resistance in Spodoptera litura. J. Agric. Food Chem.69 (21), 5840–5848. 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00723 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Malvern Instruments Ltd (2005). Zetasizer nano series user manual. MAN0317 issue 2.2. UK: Worcestershire. [Google Scholar]
  • Mansour M. H., Aboul Nasr A. E., Amr E. M. (1990). Dietary influence of two allelochemical on larval growth of the spiny bollworm Earias insulana Boisd. Z. - fuer, pflanzcnkr – ankheiten - pflanzenschutz97 (6), 580–587. [Google Scholar]
  • Marouf A. E., Harras F., Shehata E. A., Abd-Allah G. E. (2021). Efficacy of camphor oil and its nano emulsion on the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. F. Toxicol. Pest Control13 (2), 103–108. 10.21608/EAJBSF.2021.189668 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mesbah H. A., Massoud M. A., Aajel M. S., Abdelsalam N. R., Adel M. M. (2022). Nano-formulation of pelargonium graveolens essential oil: Physicochemical characterization and its bioactivity against rice weevil sitophilus oryzae on stored wheat grain. Egypt. J. Chem.0, 0. Article in Press. 10.21608/EJCHEM.2022.119611.5375 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Molai S., Memar B., Anarjan N., Hamishehkar H. (2022). The effects of main formulation and process parameters on characteristics of frankincense essential oil microemulsions. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng.41 (5), 201–215. 10.30492/IJCCE.2022.530681.4742 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moustafa H., Mohamad T., Torkey H. (2015). Effect of formulated nanoemulsion of eucalyptus oil on the cotton bollworms. J. Bio.Chemi32 (2), 478–484. [Google Scholar]
  • Nakanishi K., Koreeda M., Sasaki S., Chang M. L., Hsu H. Y. (1966). Insect hormones: The structure of ponasterone A, an insect molting hormone from the leaves of Podocarpus nakaii hay. Chem. Commun.24, 1915–1917. [Google Scholar]
  • Niebler J., Buettner A. (2016). Frankincense revisited, part I: Comparative analysis of volatiles in commercially relevant Boswellia species. Chem. Biodivers.13 (5), 613–629. 10.1002/cbdv.201500329 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Niebler J., Buettner A. (2015). Identification of odorants in frankincense (Boswellia sacra Flueck.) by aroma extract dilution analysis and two-dimensional gas chromatography – mass spectrometry/olfactometry. Phytochemistry109, 66–75. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.030 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavela R. (2016). History, presence and perspective of using plant extracts as commercial botanical insecticides and farm products for protection against insects - a review. Plant Prot. Sci.52, 229–241. 10.17221/31/2016-pps [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavela R., Maggi F., Giordani C., Cappellacci L., Petrelli R., Canale A. (2021). Insecticidal activity of two essential oils used in perfumery (ylang ylang and frankincense). Nat. Prod. Res.35 (22), 4746–4752. 10.1080/14786419.2020.1715403 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavunraj M., Baskar K., Arokiyaraj S., Rajapandiyan K., Alqarawi A., Allah E. (2020). Silver nanoparticles containing stearic acid isolated from Catharanthus roseus: Ovicidal and oviposition-deterrent activities on Earias vittella and ecotoxicological studies. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.168, 104640. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104640 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Salman K. A., Jawad S. M., Abbas S. H. (2021). Evaluation of antibacterial activity of Boswellia Serrata extract against some of the oral pathogenic bacteria. India, J. Forensic Medicine. Toxico15 (3), 3371–3376. 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15822 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saxena B. P., Mathur A. C. (1976). Loss of fecundity in Dysdercus koenigii F. due to vapors of Acorus calamus L. oil. Experientia32 (3), 315–316. 10.1007/bf01940811 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shah D. S. M. (1994). Inhibitory action of Catharanthus roseus plant extract on the oviposition of house crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus (Gryllidae: Orthoptera). Bul.l Pure. Appl. Sci. Zool.13A (2), 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma A., Kaushal P., Sharma K., Kumar R. (2006). Bio efficacy of some plant products against Diamondback moth Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). J. Entomol. Res. Soc.30, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Shi F., Zhao J., Liu Y., Wang Z., Zhang Y., Feng N. P. (2012). Preparation and characterization of solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with frankincense and myrrh oil. Int. J. Nanomedicine7, 2033–2043. 10.2147/IJN.S30085 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi L., Li W., Dong Y., Shi Y., Zhou Y., Liao X. (2021). NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase potentially involved in indoxacarb resistance in Spodoptera litura. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.173, 104775. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104775 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Subin K. (2021). Synergistic mechanism of insecticidal activity in basil (Ocimum basilicum) and Mandarin (Citrus reticulata) essential oils against the tobacco cutworm. MSc Thesis. South Korea: Seoul National University, 1–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Tadros T., Izquierdo P., Esquena J., Solans C. (2004). Formation and stability of nano-emulsions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.108 (109), 303–318. 10.1016/j.cis.2003.10.023 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weckesser S., Engel K., Simon-Haarhaus B., Wittmer A., Pelz K., Schempp C. (2007). Screening of plant extracts for antimicrobial activity against bacteria and yeasts with dermatological relevance. Phytomedicine14, 508–516. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.12.013 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams C. M. (1956). The juvenile hormone of insects. Nature178 (4526), 212–213. 10.1038/178212b0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winking M., Sarikaya S., Rahmanian A., Jodicke A., Boker D. K. (2000). Boswellic acids inhibit glioma growth: A new treatment option. J. Neurooncol.46, 97–103. 10.1023/a:1006387010528 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woolley C. L., Suhail M. M., Smith B. L., Boren K. E., Taylor L. C., Schreuder M. F., et al. (2012). Chemical differentiation of Boswellia sacra and Boswellia carterii essential oils by gas chromatography and chiral gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A1261, 158–163. 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.073 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang Y., Isman M. B., Tak J. H. (2020). Insecticidal activity of 28 essential oils and a commercial product containing Cinnamomum cassia bark essential oil against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky. Insects11 (8), 474–489. 10.3390/insects11080474 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang X., Xing H., Zhao Y., Ma Z. (2018). Pharmaceutical dispersion techniques for dissolution and bioavailability enhancement of poorly water-soluble drugs. Pharmaceutics10, 74–107. 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030074 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

Omani Frankincense nanoemulsion formulation efficacy and its latent effects on biological aspects of the spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.) (2024)

FAQs

What bugs does frankincense repel? ›

Frankincense has long been used to drive away mosquitoes and other disease-carrying insects. Mosquitos don't like it. Burning it keeps these bugs away. The Egyptians fumigated wheat silos and repelled wheat moths with it.

What are the effects of frankincense resin? ›

One of them is frankincense. This traditional medicine of the East is believed to have anti-inflammatory, expectorant, antiseptic, and even anxiolytic and anti-neurotic effects.

What is the chemical composition of frankincense resin? ›

Main Chemical Constituents of Frankincense. Modern studies have shown that the main chemical constituents isolated from frankincense are pentacyclic triterpenoids (1–25), tetracyclic triterpenoids (26–37), macrocyclic diterpenoids (38–51), and a variety of essential oils (52–63).

What is the pH of frankincense essential oil? ›

The frankincense nanoemulsion showed an acidic pH value. The pH value of the prepared formulation was 6.45.

What oil do bugs hate the most? ›

Citronella Oil

Citronella (Cymobopogon nardus) is an ingredient in many repellents. This oil is also high in citronellal and geraniol, both of which repel bugs. Products that have the right amount of citronella can be as effective as DEET when properly combined with other essential oils.

What oil gets rid of bed bugs? ›

💡 All of the tips below include essential oil. The best ones to repel bed bugs to choose from are: teatree, lavender, eucalyptus, lemon, citronella, peppermint, orange.

What happens if you put frankincense directly on skin? ›

When applied to the skin: Frankincense essential oil or gum extract is possibly safe. It might cause skin irritation in some people. When inhaled: Frankincense essential oil is possibly safe. There isn't enough reliable information to know what the side effects might be.

What does frankincense do to the brain? ›

Key Components of Frankincense:

Boswellic Acids: At the heart of frankincense's neuroprotective potential lie boswellic acids. These compounds exhibit anti-inflammatory properties, which may play a crucial role in mitigating inflammation-related damage in the brain.

Can you put frankincense in your belly button? ›

Dilute your frankincense oil in an unscented carrier oil, like olive or almond. Then, apply the oil to areas of your skin that are dry, irritated, or itchy to rejuvenate them. When applied to the navel in particular, frankincense oil is said to promote relaxation and tranquility.

What was frankincense used for in the Bible? ›

Frankincense was a perfume and spiritual incense, burned in temples throughout the East. Myrrh was a sacred anointing oil. Frankincense and Myrrh are both mentioned in the biblical book of Exodus as sacred articles in the early Jewish and Christian faiths. A Frankincense tree perched on a hilltop in modern-day Oman.

Are Boswellia and frankincense the same thing? ›

Boswellia is an herbal extract made from the bark of the boswellia tree. It is also known as frankincense. The resin (sticky substance found in trees and plants) is used to make an extract. Boswellia resin is used in Ayurvedic (traditional Indian) medicine.

What is mer in the Bible? ›

Myrrh was used in ancient Israelite temple worship as an ingredient in the holy anointing oil for consecrating priests, the tabernacle, and kings (see Exodus 30:23–25). It was used in the purification of Queen Esther (see Esther 2:12), and it was also used in embalming (see John 19:39).

What is the strongest essential oil for pain? ›

Which Essential Oils Are Best For Pain? One of Mother nature's most powerful painkillers, peppermint oil is frequently used for alleviating pain [1]. Closely related to peppermint, wintergreen oil boasts similar properties due to its methyl salicylate component.

Does frankincense help with neuropathy? ›

Frankincense-Myrrh treatment alleviates neuropathic pain via the inhibition of neuroglia activation mediated by the TLR4/MyD88 pathway and TRPV1 signaling.

Who should not take Boswellia? ›

Do not take boswellia if you are pregnant or breastfeeding. Boswellia may inhibit the liver enzymes that break down drugs, which can increase the drug effects. Avoid taking boswellia concurrently with other medications unless specifically prescribed by your physician.

What scent do all bugs hate? ›

Bugs hate the smells associated with repellency, such as lavender, citronella, vinegar, peppermint, and geranium. These oils are considered a natural way of driving away bugs from your home without harming you, your family, and other animals.

What is the best essential oil to get rid of bugs? ›

The most effective repellents contain compounds like eugenol, citronellal, and geraniol. And as far as scents go, oils like citronella, eucalyptus, lavender, lemongrass, and peppermint, are the best at keeping mosquitoes, ants, and flies at bay.

Does frankincense repel bed bugs? ›

Frankincense Essential Oil – Balsamic, woody, typical olibanum scent, frankincense is made from rosin of Boswellia sacra and is effective in killing pesky bed bugs and keeping them away from you. Eucalyptus Essential Oil – Eucalyptus is another oil that bed bugs and other bugs do not like.

What type of incense do bugs hate? ›

Mosquitoes are repelled by incense, candles, and oils derived from plants or essential oils due to their scent. There are several incense fragrances available that can be effective, including citronella, lemon, lavender, laurel, rosemary, or basil. The choice of fragrance ultimately depends on personal preference.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Last Updated:

Views: 5581

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Birthday: 1997-10-17

Address: Suite 835 34136 Adrian Mountains, Floydton, UT 81036

Phone: +3571527672278

Job: Manufacturing Agent

Hobby: Skimboarding, Photography, Roller skating, Knife making, Paintball, Embroidery, Gunsmithing

Introduction: My name is Lakeisha Bayer VM, I am a brainy, kind, enchanting, healthy, lovely, clean, witty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.